Serenity : Behind the Hype, What RWA Isn’t Telling You ?

Last week, our CEO Venket Naga joined a powerful X Space hosted by @Cryptic_Web3 — alongside YieldNestFi and Noon Capital — to unpack the hidden risks of tokenization and what truly separates Serenity from the rest.

Here’s a quick breakdown of the most important insights 💡👇

🔍 1. Who really owns tokenized real estate?

“In most cases, you’re not buying the asset, you’re buying a share in a holding company that owns it. That’s not real decentralization.”

Venket broke down the legal disconnect between token and title. That’s why Serenity’s RWS (Real World Services) is built to bridge that gap with enforceable, usable on-chain access to real assets.

📉 2. Rehypothecation & shadow risks

“The same hidden leverage that broke TradFi can repeat in DeFi if we’re not careful.”

If you can't see how your assets are reused, you don’t control them. Serenity’s focus is on-chain transparency, clear audit trails, and reducing exposure to opaque middle layers.

📊 3. Oracle manipulation & flash loan threats

“Flash loans + bad oracles = a disaster waiting to happen.”

Venket pointed out that bad price feeds can destroy trust in seconds. Serenity’s approach? Multi-source oracles, circuit breakers, and real-world asset verification.

🏦 4. Liquidity illusion in most RWA models

“There’s no point in tokenizing an asset if there’s no way to exit. People want liquidity, not just lock-in.”

Venket stressed that tokenization only makes sense if users can actually use or move their assets. Serenity focuses on building utility-first ecosystems, not speculation traps.

🔐 5. What Serenity is really building

“We’re not here to just tokenize assets. We’re building services that live on-chain — secure, sustainable, usable.”

Through products like sAxess, sBox, and the DeDaSP protocol, Serenity delivers secure ownership, biometric access, and inheritance without seed phrases or central control. It’s not just about tokenizing value — it’s about protecting it.